Asset Integrity Engineer Job Description

Asset Integrity Engineer

The process that improves operational reliability, safety and asset protection is referred to as Asset Integrity and it is done at the same time helping to maximize plant performance and mitigate the constant challenges and hazards facing heavy industries such as Oil and Gas. An Integrity Engineer would be responsible for coordinating efficient and cost-effective implementation of inspections and integrity management programs and to ensure the integrity of plant facilities. It may be applied with a pre-nominal of mechanical, inspection, asset, well or well head, technical, pipe, signal, Fabrication or Commissioning depending upon the equipment or system under scrutiny.

The Impact of AIM on Oil and Gas Infrastructure Integrity

The business challenge for asset managers is how to balance the costs of designing, maintenance, and replacement of assets with the costs of business in terms of time, resources, and finance. The managing of assets is the heart of it. The oil and gas industry's infrastructure is approaching or aging past its operational life expectancy.

Assets integrity is now considered a watchword by people because of the high cost of replacing assets and the high turn around time. Most of the time maintenance, inspection, and data management is conducted with the best of intentions, and is built on the belief that the majority of people within the company will do things properly. Things are often not completed in a timely manner.

Simple solutions like more frequent inspections won't necessarily scoop up every missed issue, nor will it engender a spirit of enthusiasm if workers are asked to increase their inspection work. There are more AIM systems on the market, but there are still no out-of-the-box solutions. Integrity systems are still seen as separate from the rest of operations, even though no inspection plan or database can deal with all the AIM issues.

Staff can be unwilling to take ownership of their responsibilities, instead seeing the suite of AIM packages as an attempt by the company to police them, rather than integral part of their role. The average rating of the professionals who own companies that have an AIM rating was 5.4 out of ten, as half of asset integrity professionals have had their budgets cut. Only 52 per cent of people thought their job load was sustainable, and the majority only had a small budget.

The two greatest issues according to those in asset integrity are budget and age of assets. The lack of communication between departments is the greatest flaw that oil and gas companies have. Work to be done.