Production Tester Job Description

A Practical Approach to Implementing Daily Testing in Production Environment

The production environment is not usually the place where testing is allowed. Smoke and sanity tests are only carried out in the production environment. Testing in production is not usually done because it is risky for the end user.

Testing can be carried out on a daily basis to eliminate the risk and to monitor the application's stability in the production environment. The daily testing cycle should be integrated by the team. A daily sanity checklist is an excellent way to make sure that the production testing covers all the main functions of the application.

The modules in the application can be divided into small chunks and distributed among the team to check for the quality. The quality of the application must be maintained by the testers and the quality assurance team. The ultimate goal of testing in production environment is to make sure that the application is stable and runs the way it is expected to.

A Culture of Constructive Criticism in Software Testing

The testing team's capabilities determine how quickly you can achieve your goals. It is important to have a blend of testers who can work together to achieve common goals. It is important that the team members have the same knowledge of the software that is being tested.

It is important to discuss the basic guidelines and expectations before starting testing work. Positive criticism should be taken. It is important to understand that both developers and testers want to make high quality software.

The idea is to learn from mistakes and avoid repeating them in the future, so a tester is not discovering bugs to show someone down. A culture of constructive criticism can be helpful. Since a software tester manager has to deal with all the details of various testing activities, it is very important for him to be in constant touch with the project manager and provide necessary support in project planning and scheduling so that the project can be successfully completed in time.

How to Stop Testing in Production

There are problems with not testing in production. Test environments are not built to the same level as production environments, so they can never really achieve the scale that you would see in real-life. Testing environments can easily get out of date and you aren't testing what you should be.

Learning a best practice begins with understanding the worst practice. The IBM WebSphere team reported an example of how testing in production can go wrong. A major bank had a test server set up for them, and their development team was responsible for setting it up.

The test application was running on the same installation as the production application. The idea of testing in production can mean different things. Are you testing a bunch of test server in your data center?

Are your test applications running on top of your production platform? Are you actually running live tests against production-deployed code? The answer should be all of these.

If the test is having an impact on the user experience, you should keep an eye on key user performance metrics. If that is the case, you should shut the test down. Make sure to encourage your team to use testing in production.

Post-Production Release Test Plan

The post production release test plan can be created anytime during the software development cycle after requirements, development scope and impact areas are identified and locked. The post production release test plan is usually easier to create for the QA. That makes it possible for there to be enough time for review and approval.

The stakeholders should be informed of any issues reported in the tool. If critical issues are found on production, communication of results should be immediately done, as a decision needs to be made if the build needs to be rolled back to investigate the issue further. The Agile process allows the same team to have a production release every 2 weeks, whereas the Waterfall model only allows for a production release every 1.5 months.

Software Testing Skills

Software testing is a process for testing an app. It is important to have certain skills as a software tester to help with testing the applications better. Testing is not easy.

It is important to any software development process. A knack for analyzing and applying concepts is required for any software tester. It is important to analyze the situation and create a solution for it.

The thought process and right mindset will help break the problem into parts, making it easier to examine the elements of the problem. System lifecycle management is an important part of testing cycle planning. It is important to have knowledge of the software.

It will give them insights into the application development process and help anticipate common complexities which can make testing difficult. Technical and professional aspects are included in the software testing skills. It is important for any individual to be able to take ownership of the project.

Being able to manage a project is important for a software tester. Project management is an important skill because it leads to better management and delivery of results and also because it promotes a sense of responsibility. A tester is often mistaken for someone who only tests the product.

How to become an Automation Tester?

The demand for testing is increasing with new-age project development methodologies like Agile and DevOps. Automation testing is vastly replacing manual testing in many ways. If you are new to automation testing, the organization that just hired you will expect you to be fast, think out of the box, and able to detect bugs or deliver solutions which no one thought of.

How can you be a successful test automation engineer with just basic knowledge of testing? What skills are needed to become an automation tester? The human eye can detect things that look off when testing.

It is difficult to detect visual issues using automation script. The tester can use viewing software from the perspective of a real-time user to find bugs in the testing. If the testing phase demands you to check how the gesture or touch feature works, what would you do?

You can not do that with automation. The procedure will be too expensive and there may be some inaccuracy. Manual approach is necessary again.

A tester writes automation script for user control scenarios and a manual tester completes the testing and bug fixing. It is true that automation testing saves a lot of time. It is an ideal choice to automate the tests because they are one a wider level and performing repetitive testing of the same scenario.